FDI and source-map signals are designed to support comparison and critical reading.
Terms
Terms for a product that compares coverage.
Fracture is an editorial intelligence product. Its analysis should be used as a context layer, not as a substitute for primary reporting or professional advice.
A divergence score is not a claim that an outlet or article is false.
Reader feedback helps identify stories that deserve a closer editorial review.
Fracture summarizes and compares public coverage.
The platform organizes source articles into clusters and produces analysis of framing differences. Users should consult original reporting when they need the full source article.
Scores are analytical signals.
Fracture scores are based on available data and model-assisted analysis. They may be incomplete, delayed, or wrong, especially during fast-moving events.
Reader feedback is quality signal.
When users flag an analysis for review, that signal should help the Fracture team improve the story read and identify possible data issues.
This page is a product placeholder.
Before launch, this page should be reviewed and replaced with legal terms that match the production service and business model.
Fracture keeps the product focused on source comparison, framing distance, and readable context instead of performative certainty.